Wednesday, April 2nd 2025

Intel Vision Presentation Labels Core Ultra 300 "Panther Lake" CPU Series as 2026 Products

Intel's freshly concluded Vision 2025 "Products Update and GTM" showcase included a segment dedicated to forthcoming Core Ultra 300 "Panther Lake" client processors. Industry watchdogs have grabbed a select few screenshots from Team Blue's broadcast from Las Vegas, Nevada—one backdropped slide confirms that Intel's next-generation mobile CPU series will launch in 2026. This information mirrors the company's Chinese office presenting of an AI PC roadmap—coverage of last month's event highlighted a scheduled first quarter 2026 "volume" arrival of "Core Ultra Next-gen Panther Lake (18A)."

Going back to early March, Intel leadership refuted online rumors of "Panther Lake" mobile CPUs being delayed into 2026, due to alleged problems encountered during the development of the Foundry service's 18A process node. An interviewed executive repeatedly insisted that his firm's brand-new series was on track for release within the second half of 2025. Fast-forward to the end of last week; Lip-Bu Tan expressed a similar outlook in a letter addressed to investors. The newly-established boss stated: "we will further enhance our (leadership) position in the second half of this year with the launch of Panther Lake, our lead product on Intel 18A, followed by Nova Lake in 2026." Industry insiders propose that the Core Ultra 300 series will become available in a very limited capacity come October, via an Early Enablement Program (EEP). Returning to this week—Jim Johnson, senior vice president of the firm's Client Computing Group, informed a watchful audience about the merits of his group's design: "I'm personally excited about Panther Lake because it combines the power efficiency of Lunar Lake, the performance of Arrow Lake, and is built to scale 18A and is on track for production later this year...Our client roadmap is the most innovative we've ever had, and we are far from done."
Intel's Business channel video description states: "hear Michelle Johnston Holthaus, CEO of Intel Product Group, Christoph Schell, Chief Commercial Officer, and guests talk about the technologies, solutions and opportunities that will shape our shared future."


TechPowerUp Editor's note: fast-forward (the above video) to the 27-minute 40-second mark for Jim Johnson's "Panther Lake" presentation segment.

Sources: Wccftech, VideoCardz, Intel Newsroom YouTube Channel, PC World
Add your own comment

17 Comments on Intel Vision Presentation Labels Core Ultra 300 "Panther Lake" CPU Series as 2026 Products

#1
dartuil
I want to go back to intel but to expensive in my country.
Got my 7600 for 180 but intel is minimum 300
:eek:
Posted on Reply
#2
john_
I guess Pat did a good job after all. Maybe he should have avoided that degradation fiasco, but he did put Intel in a position where it can do a come back.
Posted on Reply
#3
N/A
Intel signalling that 18A works. only to go back to N3 and off chip mem controller with Nova lakes. Just answer me that, what socket is nova so i don't buy expensive motherboard now.
Posted on Reply
#4
john_
N/AIntel signalling that 18A works. only to go back to N3 and off chip mem controller with Nova lakes. Just answer me that, what socket is nova so i don't buy expensive motherboard now.
Everything before Panther Lake was probably designed for older Intel nodes or TSMC. I believe they can't say in Monday morning "18A is ready" and Nova Lake switches from TSMC to 18A by Wednesday.
Posted on Reply
#5
Wirko
Every Lake processor so far has been a client processor, so is there anything unexpected in this news?
Posted on Reply
#6
tfp
Nice job Lip-Bu completely righted the ship in only a matter of weeks. If Pat only could have had these kinds of PR events.
Posted on Reply
#7
Six_Times
New CEO new delays. What a way to start your career.
Posted on Reply
#8
MxPhenom 216
ASIC Engineer
Same socket right.............RIGHT!?
Posted on Reply
#9
kondamin
MxPhenom 216Same socket right.............RIGHT!?
Would be nice of mobile chips were socketed again.
not seeing it happen any time soon though
Posted on Reply
#10
Quicks
Meh, they needed to release this, this year to combat AMD.

I guess AMD has something planned already for 2026 to destroy this.
Posted on Reply
#11
Pizdarenkowitch
MxPhenom 216Same socket right.............RIGHT!?

Forget about it.
Posted on Reply
#12
Wirko
QuicksI guess AMD has something planned already for 2026 to destroy this.
If they totally "destroy this", they may earn as much as 30% market share in corporate laptops.
Posted on Reply
#13
Dragokar
MxPhenom 216Same socket right.............RIGHT!?
Panther Lake should be 1851, Nova Lake is something else.

No mention of Xe³(p) *sadface
Posted on Reply
#14
rattlehead99
QuicksMeh, they needed to release this, this year to combat AMD.

I guess AMD has something planned already for 2026 to destroy this.
My guess is that AMD will launch in 2027, not 2026.
Also Halo Strix was a paper launch, we are getting the proper launch in Q3-4 2025
Posted on Reply
#15
RandallFlagg
WirkoIf they totally "destroy this", they may earn as much as 30% market share in corporate laptops.
Virtually no one on TPU realizes how small the desktop client space is. They automatically think about their gaming rig.
Posted on Reply
#16
N/A
kondaminWould be nice of mobile chips were socketed again.
not seeing it happen any time soon though
Current there are mutants of 12900xh and 13 14th gen also. Only a matter of conversion PCB. Too bad, I would have loved using a panther lake sporting an integrated mem controller without having to resort to mutants.
Posted on Reply
#17
efikkan
N/AIntel signalling that 18A works. only to go back to N3 and off chip mem controller with Nova lakes. Just answer me that, what socket is nova so i don't buy expensive motherboard now.
And why would you buy a motherboard now for a system you're planning to buy (presumably) ~Q3 2026, when we don't have a faint idea of how Nova Lake will even perform? Unless you're in dire need for an operational system right now, this sounds like the most expensive way to do computers. Kind of analogous to those "upgrading" their car every year or so, to a model that's hardly any different. Even if you keep a system marginally longer before upgrading, you'll not be losing out on much, and have much more noticeable upgrades.

The only rumors that I've noticed is about increased core count, and probably the last thing we need for a mainstream platforms is more cores fighting over that thermal headroom. And if true, focusing on core count for the client space is usually what we see when real architectural improvements are lacking.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 7th, 2025 10:13 HKT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts